СОЮЗ ХОТЯ И ОБМАНУТОЕ ОЖИДАНИЕ
Table of contents
Share
Metrics
СОЮЗ ХОТЯ И ОБМАНУТОЕ ОЖИДАНИЕ
Annotation
PII
S241377150000616-0-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Pages
44-51
Abstract
The commonly accepted semantic explanation of the Russian concessive conjunction khotya (though) works well for such sentences as Khotya bylo pozdno, nikto ne lozhilsya (Though it was getting late, nobody went to bed). The paper introduces new material to the point. (Cf. Though sometimes Peter may want to hire a taxi, usually he takes a bus.) It is demonstrated that the semantic meaning of the conjunction khotya (though) is based on the effect of deceived expectation.
Keywords
сoncessive conjunctions, semantics, analytical defi nition of a lexical meaning, polysemy, semantic metalanguage
Date of publication
01.01.2012
Number of purchasers
0
Views
113
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf 100 RUB / 1.0 SU

To download PDF you should sign in

Full text is available to subscribers only
Subscribe right now
Only article
100 RUB / 1.0 SU
Whole issue
0 RUB / 0.0 SU
All issues for 2012
0 RUB /  SU
1

References



Additional sources and materials

1. Bogomolova A.V. Ustupitel'nye konstrukcii s soyuzom hotya (hot') v sovremennom russkom literaturnom yazyke. Avtoref. dis. … kand. filol. nauk L., 1955.
2. Grechishnikova R.M. Slozhnoe predlozhenie s frazeologiziruyushchimisya sredstvami vyrazheniya ustupitel'nyh otnoshenij v sovremennom literaturnom russkom yazyke. Avtoref. dis. … kand. filol. nauk. L., 1971.
3. Pechenkina T.G. Sintaksicheskaya kategoriya ustupitel'nosti i formy ee vyrazheniya v russkom literaturnom yazyke vtoroj poloviny XIX veka. Avtoref. dis. … kand. filol. nauk. L., 1976.
4. Perfil'eva N.P. Sintaksicheskij status ustupitel'no-protivitel'nyh konstrukcij (v sopostavlenii s adversativnymi konstrukciyami)//Strukturno-funkcional'nyj analiz yazykovyh edinic. Irkutsk, 1985.
5. Teremova R.M. Semantika ustupitel'nosti i ee vyrazhenie v sovremennom russkom yazyke. L., 1986.
6. Apresyan V.Yu. Ustupitel'nost' v yazyke i slova so znacheniem ustupki//VYa. 1999. № 5.
7. Grammatika russkogo yazyka. T. 2. Sintaksis. Ch. 2. M., 1954.
8. Krejdlin G.E., Paducheva E. V. Znachenie i sintaksicheskie svojstva soyuza a//NTI. Ser. 2. № 9.
9. Paducheva E.V. Dinamicheskie modeli v semantike leksiki. M., 2004.
10. Lyapon M.V. Smyslovaya struktura slozhnogo predlozheniya i tekst. K tipologii vnutritekstovyh otnoshenij. M., 1986.
11. Koenig E. Concessive connectives and concessive sentences: cross-linguistic regularities and pragmatic principles//Explaining language universals/Ed. by J.A. Hawkins. Oxford, 1988.
12. Hrakovskij V.S. Ustupitel'nye konstrukcii: semantika, sintaksis, tipologiya//Tipologiya ustupitel'nyh konstrukcij/Otv. red. V.S. Hrakovskij. SPb., 2004.
13. E.V. Uryson. Soyuz HOTYa skvoz' prizmu semanticheskih primitivov//Voprosy yazykoznaniya, 2002, № 6.
14. E.V. Uryson. Opyt opisaniya semantiki soyuzov: Dannye yazyka o deyatel'nosti soznaniya. M., 2011.
15. Apresyan Yu.D. Slovarnaya stat'ya \"ZhDAT'\"//Novyj ob"yasnitel'nyj slovar' sinonimov russkogo yazyka. 2-e izd., ispr. i dopoln. Pod obshchim rukovodstvom akad. Yu.D. Apresyana. M., 2004.
16. Pekelis O.E. Sochinenie i podchinenie: kommunikativnyj podhod//Russkij yazyk v nauchnom osveshchenii. 2008. № 2 (16).
17. Glovinskaya M.Ya. \"Isporchennyj telefon\" kak osnovnoj sposob peredachi chuzhoj rechi//Russkij yazyk v ego funkcionirovanii. Tezisy dokladov mezhdunarodnoj konferencii \"Tret'i Shmelevskie chteniya\". M., 1998.
18. Sannikov V.Z. Russkie sochinitel'nye konstrukcii: Semantika. Pragmatika. Sintaksis. M., 1989.
19. Apresyan Yu.D. Osnovaniya sistemnoj leksikografii//Yazykovaya kartina mira i sistemnaya leksikografiya/Otv. red. Yu.D. Apresyan. M., 2006.